• fr
  • en

Heads of State agree to shrink EU budget by 3.5%

EU Heads of State have – finally – found an agreement on friday 8th february 2013 on the multi-annual financial framework. The total budget for the period 2014-2020 is evaluated (in constant 2011 prices) to 960 billion euros in commitments, 908 billion euros in payments, corresponding to 1% and 0.95% of GNI respectively, 6% less than the initial European Commission proposal which amounted to 1025 billion euros (1.05% of GNI) and 35 billion euros less than the current Financial Framework, which represents a 3.5% decrease. This agreement represents a significant cut in Member States effort at European level.

1% more for smart growth and cohesion, 11% less for sustainable growth

EU Heads of State have – finally – found an agreement on friday 8th february 2013 on the multi-annual financial framework. The total budget for the period 2014-2020 is evaluated (in constant 2011 prices) to 960 billion euros in commitments, 908 billion euros in payments, corresponding to 1% and 0.95% of GNI respectively, 6% less than the initial European Commission proposal which amounted to 1025 billion euros (1.05% of GNI) and 35 billion euros less than the current Financial Framework, which represents a 3.5% decrease. This agreement represents a significant cut in Member States effort at European level.In detail, the two main budget lines in which we are directly interested “smart and inclusive growth” (research and innovation, support to SMEs and cohesion) and “sustainable growth and natural resources” (CAP, fisheries and LIFE) are decreased by 8 and 3% respectively compared to Commission proposal.Compared to the 2007-2013 budget, budget allocated to smart growth represents however 1% more than today while sustainable growth looses 11.3% of its current allocation.

The budget allocated to competitiveness, comprising inter alia the programme Horizon 2020 (research and innovation) increases by 37% compared to the current period, reflecting the clear orientation towards innovation.

Within smart and inclusive growth, the line “economic, social and territorial cohesion” is decreased by 14% compared to Commission’s proposal and by 8% compared to the current period. Allocations regarding paiements to transition regions are significantly impacted while Less developed regions will benefit from a bigger effort. Allocation to outermost regions and northern sparsely populated areas is however raised by 50% compared to Commission’s proposals, showing the activity and support of concerned member states.

The budget allocated to the Connecting Europe Facility is increased compared to the current period but far less than what the Commission had wished.

The budget allocation for direct payments in the framework of the CAP decreases by 1% compared to commission’s proposal, leading to an overall decrease by 17.5% compared to the current period. Rural development allocation, agreed at 85 billion euros, decreases by 6% compared to Commission proposal and by 11.4% compared to the current 96 billion euros budget. Member States will however have the right to reallocate up to 15% of first pillar funds to the second pillar and vice-versa. For Member States which average hectare payment is below 90% of EU average, it will even be possible to raise this reverse modulation rate by 10%. This means that modulation in countries where direct payments are smaller might cut rural development budget by 25%!

The budget agreement also indicates that capping of direct payments will be put in place by Member States on a voluntary basis. The convergence mechanism of payment levels is also specified.

Budget conclusions also establish maximum co-financing rates for rural development at 75% for less developed regions, OMR and Aegean islands and for regions which GPD/capita is between 75% of EU-25 average and 75% of EU-27 average, 63% for transition regions and 53% for other regions. Besides, measures benefiting to environment and climate adaptation and mitigation will benefit from a 75% co-financing rate and amounts transfered from 1st pillar to 2nd pillar will be used without national co-financing. Further flexibility are foreseen in coherence with rural development regulation.

The negociation also led to the attribution of numerous rebates to several Member States, resulting in an obscure final distribution.

The president of the European Parliament has indicated that he would oppose this agreement, which conditions to not allow proper implementation of the European framework. European Commission leaders have however called upon the Parliament to accept the deal, even if it is way below expectations. The negotiation could go on for several months. During these months, the legislative package will have to be finalise.

You can read Council agreement here and its summary here.EU Heads of State have – finally – found an agreement on friday 8th february 2013 on the multi-annual financial framework. The total budget for the period 2014-2020 is evaluated (in constant 2011 prices) to 960 billion euros in commitments, 908 billion euros in payments, corresponding to 1% and 0.95% of GNI respectively, 6% less than the initial European Commission proposal which amounted to 1025 billion euros (1.05% of GNI) and 35 billion euros less than the current Financial Framework, which represents a 3.5% decrease. This agreement represents a significant cut in Member States effort at European level.

In detail, the two main budget lines in which we are directly interested “smart and inclusive growth” (research and innovation, support to SMEs and cohesion) and “sustainable growth and natural resources” (CAP, fisheries and LIFE) are decreased by 8 and 3% respectively compared to Commission proposal.Compared to the 2007-2013 budget, budget allocated to smart growth represents however 1% more than today while sustainable growth looses 11.3% of its current allocation.

The budget allocated to competitiveness, comprising inter alia the programme Horizon 2020 (research and innovation) increases by 37% compared to the current period, reflecting the clear orientation towards innovation.

Within smart and inclusive growth, the line “economic, social and territorial cohesion” is decreased by 14% compared to Commission’s proposal and by 8% compared to the current period. Allocations regarding paiements to transition regions are significantly impacted while less developed regions will benefit from a bigger effort. Allocation to outermost regions and northern sparsely populated areas is however raised by 50% compared to Commission’s proposals, showing the activity and support of concerned member states.

The budget allocated to the Connecting Europe Facility is increased compared to the current period but far less than what the Commission had wished.

17% less for direct payments, 11% less for rural development

The budget allocation for direct payments in the framework of the CAP decreases by 1% compared to commission’s proposal, leading to an overall decrease by 17.5% compared to the current period. Rural development allocation, agreed at 85 billion euros, decreases by 6% compared to Commission proposal and by 11.4% compared to the current 96 billion euros budget. Member States will however have the right to reallocate up to 15% of first pillar funds to the second pillar and vice-versa. For Member States which average hectare payment is below 90% of EU average, it will even be possible to raise this reverse modulation rate by 10%. This means that modulation in countries where direct payments are smaller might cut rural development budget by an additional 25%!

The budget agreement also indicates that capping of direct payments will be put in place by Member States on a voluntary basis. The convergence mechanism of payment levels is also specified and the greening principle conforted.

Budget conclusions also establish maximum co-financing rates for rural development at 75% for less developed regions, OMR and Aegean islands and for regions which GPD/capita is between 75% of EU-25 average and 75% of EU-27 average, 63% for transition regions and 53% for other regions. Besides, measures benefiting to environment and climate adaptation and mitigation will benefit from a 75% co-financing rate and amounts transfered from 1st pillar to 2nd pillar will be used without national co-financing. Further flexibility are foreseen in coherence with rural development regulation.

Rebates multiply…

The negociation also led to the attribution of numerous rebates to several Member States, resulting in an obscure final distribution.

The agreement is still uncertain

The president of the European Parliament has indicated that he would oppose this agreement, which conditions to not allow proper implementation of the European framework. European Commission leaders have however called upon the Parliament to accept the deal, even if it is way below expectations. The negotiation could go on for several months. During these months, the legislative package will have to be finalise.

Share
14 February 2013

Euromontana sur Facebook

4 days ago

Euromontana
We were today at the European Committee of the Regions too meet with regional policymakers from the Carpathians ⛰🤝 Thank you to Witold Kozłowski from the Małopolska region - also a new member of our Board of Directors - for our discussions!𝗪𝘀𝗽𝗼́𝗹𝗻𝗲 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝗠𝗮ł𝗼𝗽𝗼𝗹𝘀𝗸𝗶 𝗶 𝘀𝗶𝗲𝗰𝗶 𝗘𝘂𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗮 𝗻𝗮 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟱 𝗿. 👍Obecność wicemarszałka Witold Kozłowski w Brukseli podczas 163. Sesji Plenarnej Europejskiego Komitetu Regionów dała okazję do spotkania z dyrektorem Europejskiego Stowarzyszenia Obszarów Górskich Euromontana Guillaume Corradino. | Więcej 👇 ... See MoreSee Less
View on Facebook

5 days ago

Euromontana
One month since the #mountainconvention2024 in Puigcerdà! 🏔️ What future for #mountaineconomies? Find all the key insights in the event report! 📝🙏 Thank you to all stakeholders who shared their ideas, projects and recommendations for a brighter future in the mountains!Report 🔗 www.euromontana.org/outcomes ... See MoreSee Less
View on Facebook

1 week ago

Euromontana
Explore the new guide on ‘rural proofing for the evaluation of the rural perspective in laws, policies, plans and strategies’: bit.ly/3O995FiPublished by the Red Española de Desarrollo Rural (REDR), it intends to support authorities in incorporating a rural angle when designing, implementing, and reviewing policies and regulations.Find more information here: bit.ly/4ev41FK #RuralPact #RuralVisionEUELARD aisbl EESC - European Economic and Social Committee European Rural Development Network ODRAZ-Održivi razvoj zajednice Prepare AISBL Luonnonvarakeskus Smeunited Euromontana Diesis Network Wallonie.be ECOLISE EU CAP Network Netzwerk Zukunftsraum Land Vlaams Ruraal Netwerk Réseau wallon PAC Ruralni razvoj RH Ministerstvo zemědělství Netwerk Platteland / Netherlands Rural Network Maaeluvõrgustik Maaseutu - Tilaa elämälle Réseau national Agricultures et Ruralités 2023 - 2027 Deutsche Vernetzungsstelle Ländliche Räume Εθνικό Αγροτικό Δίκτυο - Greek National Rural Network Magyar Nemzeti Vidéki Hálózat CAP Network Ireland Rete Rurale Nazionale Lauku tīkls Ministère de l'Agriculture, de l'Alimentation et de la Viticulture Fondi.eu Krajowa Sieć Obszarów Wiejskich+ Rede Rural Nacional Rețeaua Rurală Națională - RRN Mreža za podeželje ... See MoreSee Less
View on Facebook

2 weeks ago

Euromontana
Today, members of the Rural Pact Coordination Group (RPCG) meet online to discuss: • The forthcoming RPCG Declaration on the future of EU rural policy, which addresses the open questions in the @European Commission’s ‘key achievements and ways forward’ report;• RPCG members’ position papers on the future of Europe’s rural areas;• RPCG members’ role in the Rural Pact Conference of April 2025;• Members’ actions to date & the Rural Pact Support Office 2025 work programme.More information at: bit.ly/4fwtjnS#RuralPact #RuralVisionEU ... See MoreSee Less
View on Facebook

Euromontana sur Twitter