• fr
  • en

Heads of State agree to shrink EU budget by 3.5%

EU Heads of State have – finally – found an agreement on friday 8th february 2013 on the multi-annual financial framework. The total budget for the period 2014-2020 is evaluated (in constant 2011 prices) to 960 billion euros in commitments, 908 billion euros in payments, corresponding to 1% and 0.95% of GNI respectively, 6% less than the initial European Commission proposal which amounted to 1025 billion euros (1.05% of GNI) and 35 billion euros less than the current Financial Framework, which represents a 3.5% decrease. This agreement represents a significant cut in Member States effort at European level.

1% more for smart growth and cohesion, 11% less for sustainable growth

EU Heads of State have – finally – found an agreement on friday 8th february 2013 on the multi-annual financial framework. The total budget for the period 2014-2020 is evaluated (in constant 2011 prices) to 960 billion euros in commitments, 908 billion euros in payments, corresponding to 1% and 0.95% of GNI respectively, 6% less than the initial European Commission proposal which amounted to 1025 billion euros (1.05% of GNI) and 35 billion euros less than the current Financial Framework, which represents a 3.5% decrease. This agreement represents a significant cut in Member States effort at European level.In detail, the two main budget lines in which we are directly interested “smart and inclusive growth” (research and innovation, support to SMEs and cohesion) and “sustainable growth and natural resources” (CAP, fisheries and LIFE) are decreased by 8 and 3% respectively compared to Commission proposal.Compared to the 2007-2013 budget, budget allocated to smart growth represents however 1% more than today while sustainable growth looses 11.3% of its current allocation.

The budget allocated to competitiveness, comprising inter alia the programme Horizon 2020 (research and innovation) increases by 37% compared to the current period, reflecting the clear orientation towards innovation.

Within smart and inclusive growth, the line “economic, social and territorial cohesion” is decreased by 14% compared to Commission’s proposal and by 8% compared to the current period. Allocations regarding paiements to transition regions are significantly impacted while Less developed regions will benefit from a bigger effort. Allocation to outermost regions and northern sparsely populated areas is however raised by 50% compared to Commission’s proposals, showing the activity and support of concerned member states.

The budget allocated to the Connecting Europe Facility is increased compared to the current period but far less than what the Commission had wished.

The budget allocation for direct payments in the framework of the CAP decreases by 1% compared to commission’s proposal, leading to an overall decrease by 17.5% compared to the current period. Rural development allocation, agreed at 85 billion euros, decreases by 6% compared to Commission proposal and by 11.4% compared to the current 96 billion euros budget. Member States will however have the right to reallocate up to 15% of first pillar funds to the second pillar and vice-versa. For Member States which average hectare payment is below 90% of EU average, it will even be possible to raise this reverse modulation rate by 10%. This means that modulation in countries where direct payments are smaller might cut rural development budget by 25%!

The budget agreement also indicates that capping of direct payments will be put in place by Member States on a voluntary basis. The convergence mechanism of payment levels is also specified.

Budget conclusions also establish maximum co-financing rates for rural development at 75% for less developed regions, OMR and Aegean islands and for regions which GPD/capita is between 75% of EU-25 average and 75% of EU-27 average, 63% for transition regions and 53% for other regions. Besides, measures benefiting to environment and climate adaptation and mitigation will benefit from a 75% co-financing rate and amounts transfered from 1st pillar to 2nd pillar will be used without national co-financing. Further flexibility are foreseen in coherence with rural development regulation.

The negociation also led to the attribution of numerous rebates to several Member States, resulting in an obscure final distribution.

The president of the European Parliament has indicated that he would oppose this agreement, which conditions to not allow proper implementation of the European framework. European Commission leaders have however called upon the Parliament to accept the deal, even if it is way below expectations. The negotiation could go on for several months. During these months, the legislative package will have to be finalise.

You can read Council agreement here and its summary here.EU Heads of State have – finally – found an agreement on friday 8th february 2013 on the multi-annual financial framework. The total budget for the period 2014-2020 is evaluated (in constant 2011 prices) to 960 billion euros in commitments, 908 billion euros in payments, corresponding to 1% and 0.95% of GNI respectively, 6% less than the initial European Commission proposal which amounted to 1025 billion euros (1.05% of GNI) and 35 billion euros less than the current Financial Framework, which represents a 3.5% decrease. This agreement represents a significant cut in Member States effort at European level.

In detail, the two main budget lines in which we are directly interested “smart and inclusive growth” (research and innovation, support to SMEs and cohesion) and “sustainable growth and natural resources” (CAP, fisheries and LIFE) are decreased by 8 and 3% respectively compared to Commission proposal.Compared to the 2007-2013 budget, budget allocated to smart growth represents however 1% more than today while sustainable growth looses 11.3% of its current allocation.

The budget allocated to competitiveness, comprising inter alia the programme Horizon 2020 (research and innovation) increases by 37% compared to the current period, reflecting the clear orientation towards innovation.

Within smart and inclusive growth, the line “economic, social and territorial cohesion” is decreased by 14% compared to Commission’s proposal and by 8% compared to the current period. Allocations regarding paiements to transition regions are significantly impacted while less developed regions will benefit from a bigger effort. Allocation to outermost regions and northern sparsely populated areas is however raised by 50% compared to Commission’s proposals, showing the activity and support of concerned member states.

The budget allocated to the Connecting Europe Facility is increased compared to the current period but far less than what the Commission had wished.

17% less for direct payments, 11% less for rural development

The budget allocation for direct payments in the framework of the CAP decreases by 1% compared to commission’s proposal, leading to an overall decrease by 17.5% compared to the current period. Rural development allocation, agreed at 85 billion euros, decreases by 6% compared to Commission proposal and by 11.4% compared to the current 96 billion euros budget. Member States will however have the right to reallocate up to 15% of first pillar funds to the second pillar and vice-versa. For Member States which average hectare payment is below 90% of EU average, it will even be possible to raise this reverse modulation rate by 10%. This means that modulation in countries where direct payments are smaller might cut rural development budget by an additional 25%!

The budget agreement also indicates that capping of direct payments will be put in place by Member States on a voluntary basis. The convergence mechanism of payment levels is also specified and the greening principle conforted.

Budget conclusions also establish maximum co-financing rates for rural development at 75% for less developed regions, OMR and Aegean islands and for regions which GPD/capita is between 75% of EU-25 average and 75% of EU-27 average, 63% for transition regions and 53% for other regions. Besides, measures benefiting to environment and climate adaptation and mitigation will benefit from a 75% co-financing rate and amounts transfered from 1st pillar to 2nd pillar will be used without national co-financing. Further flexibility are foreseen in coherence with rural development regulation.

Rebates multiply…

The negociation also led to the attribution of numerous rebates to several Member States, resulting in an obscure final distribution.

The agreement is still uncertain

The president of the European Parliament has indicated that he would oppose this agreement, which conditions to not allow proper implementation of the European framework. European Commission leaders have however called upon the Parliament to accept the deal, even if it is way below expectations. The negotiation could go on for several months. During these months, the legislative package will have to be finalise.

Share
14 February 2013

Euromontana sur Facebook

5 days ago

Euromontana
Today, members of the Rural Pact Coordination Group (RPCG) meet online to discuss: • The forthcoming RPCG Declaration on the future of EU rural policy, which addresses the open questions in the @European Commission’s ‘key achievements and ways forward’ report;• RPCG members’ position papers on the future of Europe’s rural areas;• RPCG members’ role in the Rural Pact Conference of April 2025;• Members’ actions to date & the Rural Pact Support Office 2025 work programme.More information at: bit.ly/4fwtjnS#RuralPact #RuralVisionEU ... See MoreSee Less
View on Facebook

6 days ago

Euromontana
📢 #CallForProposals: you can now submit proposals for the #InternationalMountainConference!The international conference dedicated to #MountainResearch is taking place from 14-18 September 2025 in #Innsbruck. It is being organised by the Research Area “Mountain Regions” at the Universität Innsbruck ⛰️🇦🇹📝 The #IMC is currently looking for proposals focusing on scientific research in #MountainRegions around the world. There are six formats to choose from, including plenary sessions and workshops - find out more and submit your proposal by 28 November: loom.ly/ntncy_M ... See MoreSee Less
View on Facebook

2 weeks ago

Euromontana
We're at the #Gismart project Kick Off meeting in Paris today to share guidelines on communication, dissemination and exploitation of results 💡For the next two days, we will discuss the following steps to assess the sustainability of geographical indications all over Europe, including in the mountains ⛰️🌱🚜👩‍🌾 How to transition to more sustainable diet systems ? 🌱 How to implement the Farm to Fork Strategy?🥩🧀 how to develop a methodology to assess economic, social, environnemental dimensions of GIs sustainability?Pleased to be working on this key topic with INRAE and to continue collaboration with AREPO! More info on GI-SMART 🔗 www.euromontana.org/gi-smart/ ... See MoreSee Less
View on Facebook

3 weeks ago

Euromontana
🌄 A week ago, we were opening the #MountainConvention2024 in the stunning Catalan Pyrenees! 🏔️✨ 250 mountain stakeholders came together in Puigcerdà to shape the #MountainEconomies of tomorrow! 💬 In the face of socio-economic, environmental, and demographic transitions, our economies must become 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐬, 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐭, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 than ever! 💪🌱From fair remuneration of farmers & ecosystem services, to funding for the transition of mountain resorts, circular economy development for wool and wood products, support for entrepreneurship and interesting public procurement or taxes systems ... all a huge thank you to everyone for your energy and ideas! 🙌 These will be captured in the 𝐏𝐮𝐢𝐠𝐜𝐞𝐫𝐝𝐚̀ 𝐃𝐞𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, which will be presented on 11 December on International Mountain Day 📜🏔️🔜 Presentations and materials will soon be available! A special thank you to our co-organisers Territori. Generalitat de Catalunya. and CREAF, as well as our supporters Ajuntament de Puigcerdà , #NEMOR Network for European Mountain Research, European Rural Pact 🙏 ... See MoreSee Less
View on Facebook

Euromontana sur Twitter