• fr
  • en

Overcoming the “costs of non-Europe” in EU border regions

Euromontana attended a workshop focused on the barriers and potentials for growth and development in EU border regions. The workshop was organised by the Regional Studies Association on Tuesday 10 October 2017 during the European Week of Regions and Cities 2017. The main question tackled during the workshop concerned why the integration of EU border regions is a challenge for local and regional authorities although the Lisbon Treaty set out territorial cohesion as a European general objective to ensure the provision of services of general interest to all (health, water, transport, education – to only name a few).

The costs of non-Europe in border areas

The economic case for cross-border cooperation was recently made in the study “Quantification of the effects of legal and administrative border obstacles in land border regions” led by Politecnico di Milano for the European Commission. According to the study, borders hamper economic development and social inclusion. The study measured missed growth, or the “costs  of non-Europe”, using a regional growth model based on assets and data collected for the Eurobarometer 422. The results speak of themselves: €500 billion losses in terms of GDP are estimated for 2013 (representing 3% of EU GDP) and in border regions especially, the losses actually represent 9% of GDP. Nearly 6 million jobs are lost across the EU because of legal and administrative barriers. There is no Member State specificity in the results (no East/West divide) but the highest losses are measured in the corridor between France and Germany (see figure taken from the study – the study is not in open access but results are exploited in the staff working document accompanying the 2017 EC Communication “Boosting Growth and Cohesion in EU Border Regions”).

Identifying challenges and obstacles in border areas

Indeed, Stefanie Dühr (Professor of European Spatial Planning Systems at Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen School of Management, the Netherlands) presented the specific challenges border regions face such as population change, decrease of attractivity because of urban concentration, accessibility when mountains or large rivers constitute the border, and of course asymmetries in provision of services and/or compatibility of laws and regulations across borders which don’t always play out in favour of local inhabitants depending on where they live and work.

Following the Luxembourg Presidency of the Council of the EU (2nd half of 2015) and its proposal to create a new legal tool for cross-border cooperation, a Working Group on innovative solutions to cross-border obstacles was established by Luxembourg and France. In their final report published in August 2017, they identify the following types of obstacles to cross-border cooperation (see figure taken from their report):

  • Costs of services of general interest (transport infrastructure for instance),
  • Institutional obstacles (to manage cross-border funding and competences),
  • Administrative & legal obstacles

How to address these obstacles at the European level?

These obstacles are partly being addressed at the European level, for instance, the costs challenges are addressed by financial support such as the cross-border Interreg programmes or European Investment Bank (EIB) support and institutional obstacles are addressed by tools such as European Groupings of Territorial Cooperation for instance (EGTC).

However, important gaps remain and above all, it is the local level which needs to implement solutions to these issues. The European Commission published in September a Communication presenting its 10 foreseen actions to boost growth and cohesion in cross-border regions (to know more, read Euromontana’s article, by clicking here – only for Euromontana members). 

Tools implemented by the EC such as the cross-border Interreg programmes or European Groupings of Territorial Cooperation partly help to bridge the gap but Member States still detain a lot of power when it comes to national legal administration. Incidentally, this is the most important obstacle identified by the general public too as revealed in the online public consultation “Overcoming obstacles in border regions” (see figure taken from consultation report).

Concluding remarks

The participants of the workshop vividly discussed which governance should be implemented in cross-border areas in order to not lose economic and social potential. Indeed, the economic losses are said to come from overcosts generated by sub-optimal use of resources in border regions according to the study led by Politecnico di Milano for the EC. Reflexion will be pursued at the European level to find mechanisms to ensure border regions can jointly manage spatial planning and integrate national interests with cross-border development. This is particularly important for mountain areas which often constitute border areas.

Share
27 October 2017

Euromontana sur Facebook

5 days ago

Euromontana
Today, members of the Rural Pact Coordination Group (RPCG) meet online to discuss: • The forthcoming RPCG Declaration on the future of EU rural policy, which addresses the open questions in the @European Commission’s ‘key achievements and ways forward’ report;• RPCG members’ position papers on the future of Europe’s rural areas;• RPCG members’ role in the Rural Pact Conference of April 2025;• Members’ actions to date & the Rural Pact Support Office 2025 work programme.More information at: bit.ly/4fwtjnS#RuralPact #RuralVisionEU ... See MoreSee Less
View on Facebook

6 days ago

Euromontana
📢 #CallForProposals: you can now submit proposals for the #InternationalMountainConference!The international conference dedicated to #MountainResearch is taking place from 14-18 September 2025 in #Innsbruck. It is being organised by the Research Area “Mountain Regions” at the Universität Innsbruck ⛰️🇦🇹📝 The #IMC is currently looking for proposals focusing on scientific research in #MountainRegions around the world. There are six formats to choose from, including plenary sessions and workshops - find out more and submit your proposal by 28 November: loom.ly/ntncy_M ... See MoreSee Less
View on Facebook

2 weeks ago

Euromontana
We're at the #Gismart project Kick Off meeting in Paris today to share guidelines on communication, dissemination and exploitation of results 💡For the next two days, we will discuss the following steps to assess the sustainability of geographical indications all over Europe, including in the mountains ⛰️🌱🚜👩‍🌾 How to transition to more sustainable diet systems ? 🌱 How to implement the Farm to Fork Strategy?🥩🧀 how to develop a methodology to assess economic, social, environnemental dimensions of GIs sustainability?Pleased to be working on this key topic with INRAE and to continue collaboration with AREPO! More info on GI-SMART 🔗 www.euromontana.org/gi-smart/ ... See MoreSee Less
View on Facebook

3 weeks ago

Euromontana
🌄 A week ago, we were opening the #MountainConvention2024 in the stunning Catalan Pyrenees! 🏔️✨ 250 mountain stakeholders came together in Puigcerdà to shape the #MountainEconomies of tomorrow! 💬 In the face of socio-economic, environmental, and demographic transitions, our economies must become 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐬, 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐭, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 than ever! 💪🌱From fair remuneration of farmers & ecosystem services, to funding for the transition of mountain resorts, circular economy development for wool and wood products, support for entrepreneurship and interesting public procurement or taxes systems ... all a huge thank you to everyone for your energy and ideas! 🙌 These will be captured in the 𝐏𝐮𝐢𝐠𝐜𝐞𝐫𝐝𝐚̀ 𝐃𝐞𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, which will be presented on 11 December on International Mountain Day 📜🏔️🔜 Presentations and materials will soon be available! A special thank you to our co-organisers Territori. Generalitat de Catalunya. and CREAF, as well as our supporters Ajuntament de Puigcerdà , #NEMOR Network for European Mountain Research, European Rural Pact 🙏 ... See MoreSee Less
View on Facebook

Euromontana sur Twitter